Archive for the 'politics' Category

The Howling of Stuck Pigs

According to its own narrative, the government is fighting the good fight against “economic interests” who wish to hold the people of Argentina in servitude. This narrative also holds that control of the media is one of the principle methods employed by those interests for the creation of public consent for their activities and expansion. With the government’s new media regulation bill being passed into law by the senate last night we are supposed to believe that these interests have been dealt a severe blow.

Judging by the howls of protest from the Clarín group these interests have at least been given something to think about. However, the fact that some of the unloveliest standard bearers of Argentine capitalism are roaring like stuck pigs doesn’t mean that they are going to die. They didn’t get where where they are by being either slow or stupid and they’ll adapt to the new regulatory environment and do their damnedest to have it modified to suit their needs. Also, the media businesses which the new law will oblige them to divest themselves of will be bought by capitalists not a whit more fragrant than the current specimens and while it’s nice that that NGOs and indigenous peoples will be able to have their own radio and TV stations it´ll be very surprising if any great number of people want to tune into them.

So, a cheer and a half for the new media law. It’s nice to hear the pigs squealing. In due course, though, they’ll get their act together and join any new entrants in the great mission of making the country safe for half-cocked capitalism.

“Inglorious Basterds”

The Holocaust. Representations of  the Holocaust, what it’s possible to say about certain things. Jews as natural allies of native Americans and blacks, an ode to miscegenation.  Do people who prostitute art and especially cinema, deserve to live?  An exploding, orgasmic, revenge fantasy. References to dozens of other films. Some excellent jokes. Spoken in English, French, German and Italian. Beautifully shot and great art direction. Very violent and about the redemptive and necessary parts of violence. Against  proportional violence. if violence is necessary only too much is enough and then it’s barely enough.

Orientalism in “The Atlantic”

Robert Kaplan doesn’t think that Christopher Hill is the right man to be US ambassador in Bagdad. I have no idea whether he’s right or not but I think one of the reasons he gives for objecting to Hill’s appointment is nonsense. He writes:

The Arabs, like other cultures and civilizations, have deeply ingrained characteristics of language and history that require years of study before an outsider can be truly effective in their midst.

The Arabs, eh? They have a language and a history; who’d have thought it? And you need years of study to be truly effective in their midst. They, you see, are not like us. While white English speakers like Kaplan and me say what we mean and mean what we say the Arabs – all of them, from Casablanca to Kuwait – speak in riddles, jealously guard their women, are loyal to their clans, are prone to sudden bursts of temper and  violent mood swings, are inordinately influenced by their religious beliefs and haven’t really caught up with this Enlightened world. In fact, when you come to think about it, they’re not really people, not in the full sense anyway.

Okay, I’m exaggerating a bit but you can see what I mean. Kaplan is giving us Orientalism by numbers and passing it off as serious analysis.

Gelman and Good Dictatorships

Juan Gelman is a poet, is widely regarded as being a human rights campaigner and when he was younger he was an active participant in revolutionary Peronism. Regular readers of this increasingly neglected blog will know that I don’t have a high opinion of Gelman.

However, even I was surprised by the depths he stoops to in a piece published in Pagina/12 today. It’s an acceptance speech for some bauble awarded to him under the auspices of the Chinese government. Here are some choice quotes:

On the 13th of April last the Chinese government published a national action plan for human rights which guarantees the basic civil rights of the entire population including women, children, the disabled and ethnic minorities…

In the introduction to the action plan the government recognizes that “China has a long way to go with its efforts to improve human rights.” As it proceeds along this path the death penalty will undoubtedly be abolished, the independence of the judiciary will be strengthened, censorship of publishers and the media will be softened, political prisoners who have not committed acts against the security of the state will be released, those responsible for disappearances, especially those of children, will be caught and punished and other relaveant measures will also be adopted…

The USA and western powers support terrorist groups and separitists who are trying to break China up into weak feudal domains and satrapies, the better to dominate them. Tibet and Taiwan form part of China since time immemorial.

Can Gelman possibly believe that the Chinese government is going to abolish the death penalty? And note that he only hopes for a softening of censorship and thinks its fine to hold political prisoners if they have committed acts  against state security. Guess who will be deciding whether they have or not? Yup, the judiciary whose non-existent autonomy he’d like to see augmented.

As anybody who has read a tiny bit of history knows, some of the most infernal regimes have had constitutions bursting with good intentions and have claimed to be passionate defenders of human rights. The Soviet Union was one such and Cuba today is another. Rather than judge the government of China on its decades of repression, torture and mass murder, the sainted Gelman decides to judge it on yet another blast of hot air  from the regime.

So, if you’re Taiwanese and you’d like to continue to enjoy the benefits of living in a liberal democracy, well, screw you. The great panjandrum of the human rights movement in Argentina thinks you should forget about all that nonsense and rejoin the motherland, where you’ll do well to keep your opinions to yourself if you don’t want to end up in a “reeducation” camp.

And if you are a Tibetan or an Uighur who doesn’t regard yourself as part of the Chinese nation,  who doesn’t want your culture and people to be turned into theme park amusements for tourists  and would like to assert your national rights, you are in even worse luck. As  far as Gelman is concerned you can quite literally fuck off and die. All you are is tool of imperialism.

Gelman is a hypocrite and fraud who never saw an anti-American dictatorship – no matter how monstrous – he didn’t like. This article also gives us a fair insight into what Argentina would look like today if he and his comrades and triumphed in the struggles of their  youth.

Sapere Aude!

Por primera vez en la vida siento un poco de simpatía por algo escrito en La Barbarie. Alejandro  se atrevió a escribir un post que cuestiona algunos aspectos del received wisdom de la izquierda peronista sobre los setenta y una jauría de compañeros hinchados de pretensiones de superioridad moral  han descendidos sobre  el.  No se pierdan los comments de MEC acá, acá y acá también

Next Page »


Archives